<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Lack of Awareness: Wael Shawky and the Non-Issue at &#8220;Lucky Number Seven&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leannegoebel.com/2009/11/09/a-lack-of-awareness-wael-shawky-and-the-non-issue-at-lucky-number-seven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leannegoebel.com/2009/11/09/a-lack-of-awareness-wael-shawky-and-the-non-issue-at-lucky-number-seven/</link>
	<description>Award-winning Art &#38; Culture Journalist writing about the Rocky Mountain West and Southwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 06:08:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egyptian Artist Wael Shawky wins Ernst Schering Foundation Art Award &#171; Art Writer</title>
		<link>http://leannegoebel.com/2009/11/09/a-lack-of-awareness-wael-shawky-and-the-non-issue-at-lucky-number-seven/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egyptian Artist Wael Shawky wins Ernst Schering Foundation Art Award &#171; Art Writer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leannegoebel.com/?p=922#comment-493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in January, Egyptian artist Wael Shawky was awarded the Ernst Schering Foundation Art Award. The prize, which is awarded by the Ernst [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in January, Egyptian artist Wael Shawky was awarded the Ernst Schering Foundation Art Award. The prize, which is awarded by the Ernst [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vilis Inde</title>
		<link>http://leannegoebel.com/2009/11/09/a-lack-of-awareness-wael-shawky-and-the-non-issue-at-lucky-number-seven/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vilis Inde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leannegoebel.com/?p=922#comment-184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Censorship - This is a very difficult issue. It is easy to denounce any form of censorship in the name of Freedom of Expression. Were the Trustees of the Corcoran Gallery wrong when they decided to cancel the Mapplethorpe Exhibit? It is easy to say - of course they were wrong &amp; that the exhibit was hardly offensive. But, the Trustees knew that they were in the middle of the &quot;culture war&quot;. They knew that they would lose any and all NEA support. The institution was in a no-win situation. It would suffer damage regardless of what it did.
It was very odd to be in Marfa when J Meese decided to do a perfomance of a German&#039;s interpretation of the Wild West (sponsored by Ballroom Marfa). It was simply odd. How interesting is it to have Meese, wholly unfamiliar with a culture mock it and mix his own sexual performance with his preconcieved notions? Fine, I did not care.
In some ways, their is an irony here. Americans feel that they know what&#039;s best for the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Perhaps, in the name of Freedom of Expression, we should send the Chippendales to do a perfomance in Tehran. Things sometimes need to be censored. Noone in the art world does this lightly. 
This is a legitimate issue for debate, but neither side is 100% correct. I do not come down on either side of this issue because I simply do not know enough. But, I will say that institutions must sometimes censor things. In fact, they do so all the time - simply in making curatorial decisions, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Censorship &#8211; This is a very difficult issue. It is easy to denounce any form of censorship in the name of Freedom of Expression. Were the Trustees of the Corcoran Gallery wrong when they decided to cancel the Mapplethorpe Exhibit? It is easy to say &#8211; of course they were wrong &amp; that the exhibit was hardly offensive. But, the Trustees knew that they were in the middle of the &#8220;culture war&#8221;. They knew that they would lose any and all NEA support. The institution was in a no-win situation. It would suffer damage regardless of what it did.<br />
It was very odd to be in Marfa when J Meese decided to do a perfomance of a German&#8217;s interpretation of the Wild West (sponsored by Ballroom Marfa). It was simply odd. How interesting is it to have Meese, wholly unfamiliar with a culture mock it and mix his own sexual performance with his preconcieved notions? Fine, I did not care.<br />
In some ways, their is an irony here. Americans feel that they know what&#8217;s best for the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Perhaps, in the name of Freedom of Expression, we should send the Chippendales to do a perfomance in Tehran. Things sometimes need to be censored. Noone in the art world does this lightly.<br />
This is a legitimate issue for debate, but neither side is 100% correct. I do not come down on either side of this issue because I simply do not know enough. But, I will say that institutions must sometimes censor things. In fact, they do so all the time &#8211; simply in making curatorial decisions, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crichter</title>
		<link>http://leannegoebel.com/2009/11/09/a-lack-of-awareness-wael-shawky-and-the-non-issue-at-lucky-number-seven/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crichter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leannegoebel.com/?p=922#comment-183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find your article (and the story for which it is about) more interesting than a lot of the work that was featured in that exhibition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find your article (and the story for which it is about) more interesting than a lot of the work that was featured in that exhibition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

